The Docket
Trade claims ranked by evidence, not by applause. A claim climbs when a shop attests it from its own work (+2), reports an outcome (+3), or a document anchors it (+5 per document class — code text, an MSDS, a spec sheet, a certification). Vendor voices add nothing on their own wares; echoes and copy-paste add nothing at all. A claim refuted by a test or a document keeps its place in line — capped below the evidence that refuted it, marked REFUTED, never deleted.
Nothing on this page is certified. These are the court's working papers, published so any shop can see exactly what a claim still needs: one more outcome, one document, one honest test.
D-1 · N12 — Removal-chemical safety family: the hazard is real; the harmlessness claims are false.
Shop 22 · Doc 5 · Total 27 · Both lanes high · Both lanes high
Shop 22 (8 first-person attestations ×2 = 16: 181407 OP, Black Star Signs, unclebun, JaySea20, zillion29, CreativeCreationGraphics, ChicagoGraphics, sinclairgraphics1 · outcomes +3 employee collapse, +3 accidental ingestion) / Doc 5 (MSDS class: ingredient list quoted in-thread, 147120; symptoms quoted, 181407 — one class, counted once; relay grade, see F2) / Total 27. The court would decide: the normative hazard claim (document lane partial until a firsthand current SDS lands — G6), the practice limbs (rag-not-spray and ventilation, +6 attested; heat-first, +4), and the waste-storage limb.
citrus based… won't harm you
"citrus based… won't harm you" (Solventinkjet, 147120, post 9) — vendor claim, 0 points of its own; refuted by the MSDS ingredient list quoted in the same thread and by four independent exposure accounts.
fumes aren't toxic
"fumes aren't toxic" (Solventinkjet, 181407, post 3) — refuted by the MSDS-quoted symptoms and the attested confined-space collapse in the same record. The same vendor voice made both claims; the register (§6, C30) carries the pattern.
D-4 · N8 — Insurance: class codes, not shop behavior, set the rate.
Shop 26 · Doc 0 · Total 26
Shop 26 (10 shops' own-book attestations ×2 = 20: 148726's two rate-table posters, Brightbox, equippaint, 167264, 167667, Pippin Decals, dale911, 182969's two scope points · outcomes +3 retroactive reclassification as reported by the one shop it happened to, +3 renewal-drop pattern) / Doc 0 (posters' own rate tables ride at shop weight — they are not in Amendment 3's document classes) / Total 26. The chester215 correction is load-bearing in this composition: the reclassification outcome is one shop, counted once; the rate *structure* is what ten books corroborate. Judges decide the structure claim, the rider trigger, and Garage Keepers' scope — not the single shop's story twice.
D-5 · N13 — DIGIprint fulfillment pattern (US locus, 2018–19).
Shop 24 · Doc 0 · Total 24
Shop 24 (6 shops ×2 = 12 · four reported failure outcomes +3 ×4 = 12) / Doc 0 / Total 24. Vendor's same-day claim in-thread: 0 (vendor, uncashed). Limbs: wrong-part externality Shop 7 (FactorDesign +2 +3 outcome; Jamco +2); severe non-delivery limb Shop 5 (Dangreenst +2 +3 — single shop, building, carried at that weight); locus split preserved against the pattern — Europe/Belgium fulfillment Shop 12 the other way (colin smyth +2 +3, FatCat +2, Jamco +2 +3), so the court's claim is locus-and-period-bounded, not brand-wide.
D-6 · Fee-plus-cost pricing (Pass 3 triangulated; re-verified firsthand by Pass 3).
Shop 18 · Doc 0 · Total 18 · Shop Corroborated · Shop Corroborated
Shop 18 (≥6 shops ×2 = 12 across 62537, 166207, 149228, 110185, 2010–2026 · sustained-use outcomes +3 ×2) / Doc 0 / Total 18, SHOP CORROBORATED. Judges decide the model and its stated conditions.
D-7 · N11 Canon limb — a proposal-printed service price is not a locked price.
Shop 17 · Doc 0 · Total 17 · Shop Corroborated · Shop Corroborated; Contested limbs inside
Shop 17 (4 shops ×2 = 8: OP Brian Tickenoff, balstestrat, Pauly, victor bogdanov · outcomes +3 billed at +21.25%, +3 five-year lock purchased, +3 later-buy concentration) / Doc 0 / Total 17, SHOP CORROBORATED. The fairness dispute rides contested; the mechanism is attested by both sides of it.
D-8 · N17 — Capability-awareness complex (counted once, both records).
Shop 16 · Doc 0 · Total 16 · Shop Corroborated · Shop Corroborated; Contested limbs inside
Shop 16 (173596's five shops ×2 = 10 · 156085's seller-side voices +6 on Pass 3's basis — the pair is one complex, so this is a single composition, not two corroborations) / Doc 0 / Total 16, SHOP CORROBORATED. Limbs: ask-the-defector practice +6 (3 shops); convenience mechanism +4 (2 shops, countermeasure flagged inference); return-pricing contested, punitive pole +2 as stated intention only.
D-2 · N14 — Photo-Tex pair: the converged pick, and where it fails.
Shop 10 · Doc 5 · Total 15 · Both lanes high · Shop Corroborated; Both lanes high
Fall claim — Shop 10 (tbullo +2, JBurton +2 · two first-person fall outcomes +3 +3) / Doc 5 (manufacturer disclaimer class, quoted in-thread by tbullo — relay grade, F2) / Total 15. Pick limb — Shop 8 (4 independent shops ×2: MikePro, RabidOne, Elwood "Woody" Smith, jfiscus) / Doc 0 / 8, SHOP CORROBORATED. The court would decide the pair *as a pair*: pick and warning coexist; jfiscus's "competitors fall off" limb is not evidence about Photo-Tex and is excluded from the fall claim's composition.
D-9 · Over-length tiling at natural breaks (176095 WI-1).
Shop 15 · Doc 0 · Total 15 · Shop Corroborated · Shop Corroborated
Shop 15 (7 shops ×2 = 14 · customer adoption = partial outcome +1; install unreported) / Doc 0 / Total 15, SHOP CORROBORATED. Pricing limb (WI-2) Shop 6 (3 formulations, one rule) — also filed as the consumed-size cluster's print-side relative (D-10).
D-3 · HPL for outdoor interpretive panels (176087 WI-1).
Shop 9 · Doc 5 · Total 14 · Both lanes high · Both lanes high
Shop 9 (3 shops ×2 = 6: A Signage, DJS, tulsagraphics · 15-year outcome +3) / Doc 5 (manufacturer warranty terms class, relayed by users — F2) / Total 14. Porcelain limb below it at Shop 4 (2 shops ×2) with its 25-year warranty figure relayed, unscored as a document (same class already counted at D-3's anchor is *not* transferred — limbs keep their own lanes; porcelain's doc lane is 5 on the same relay basis, shown here so the court sees it: 4 / 5 / 9). Second-surface construction limb: Shop 4 (2 shops).
D-15 · N9 — Neon transformer sizing by the footage/diameter chart + protocol limbs (Pass 3 basis).
Shop 8 · Doc 5 · Total 13
Shop 8 (Pass 3 firsthand composition) / Doc 5 on the datasheet limb only (173527, manufacturer spec class, relay grade — F2) / Total 13, with 180129's tail unreconciled beside it and 134560 expressly not merged (D-13).
D-10 · Consumed-size billing.
Shop 12 · Doc 0 · Total 12 · Shop Corroborated · Shop Corroborated; Contested limbs inside
Shop 12 (6 attestations ×2 across 62708, 159385, 91193, 69397, 122462 + one) / Doc 0 / Total 12, SHOP CORROBORATED. 131537 (sell-by-the-sheet) rides as limb, not a seventh attestation. Square-foot-pricing rejection for cut work: Shop 4 (2 threads, zero voice overlap). Surcharge file: 164615 limb contested; 112184 / 91259 / 148784 / 147948 limbs at attestation weight (Pass 3 basis).
D-11 · N10 — The diagnostics complex (isolation family and wings).
Scored by members — no aggregate sum (F5)
*Scored by members; no aggregate sum (see F5).* The method claim the court would decide: isolate by changing one variable; the swap's result is the datum — cashed independently in every member below.
| Member | Shop | Composition |
|---|---:|---|
| 180300 consumable-supply (ink swap closed it) | 10 | OP +2 +3 outcome; Glavin_ID +2 +3 outcome |
| 166348 WI-2 brand swap (Briteline→GF WindowMark) | 10 | Precision +2 +3; southtexasprinter +2 +3 |
| 182769 media-side (hand oil; OP's A/B) | 9 | Boudica +2, IVIS702 +2, OP +2 +3 partial-limb outcome |
| 176164 material-side (two-plotter) | 8 | OP +2; The Duke +2 +3; VizualVoice +1 |
| 167443 board test-point | 7 | OP +2 +3; Neil +2 (method + own case) |
| 178430 replacement-part (new dampers DOA) | 7 | OP +2 +3; netsol discriminator +2 |
| 178549 file-side (RGB black / ink load) | 7 | Neil +2; OP +2 +3 — two-change confound disclosed on the item |
| 124800 board-damage-by-replacement (P3) | 5+ | Pass 3 firsthand basis; outcome-closed |
| 157073 used-manifold (P3) | 5+ | Pass 3 firsthand basis; outcome-closed |
| 69159 WI-1/WI-2 laminator pair | 5 | nip test: scallahan +2, OP adoption +1; hand-tension A/B: Kwiksigns +2 (no outcome) |
| 183925 settings member (mid-print clean) | 4 | Boudica +2, OP +2; cure untested, vendor caveat rides |
| Never-solved file (5 cases) | — | 148156, 143027, 167224, 140403, 178943: membership re-audited this pass; 177976 and 170134 declined (unfinished ladders — §1). The file is docketed as a standing exhibit, not a claim. |
N19 test-state wing (inside D-11's complex, members scored): 183773 under-load protocol Shop 2 (BillyBob; vendor concurrence +0 uncashed; no outcome) · 170134 WI-3 drop-test validity Shop 2 (balstestrat) · 183280 WI-1 adhesion test-state Shop 2 (DL Signs) · 123212 item 4 dwell confound Shop 2 (P3 basis) · 175952 WI-2 ink-temperature lag Shop 0 / Doc 5 (manufacturer-staff statement classed as manufacturer spec-or-disclaimer — flagged F2: a single staff forum post earning documentary-high is the formula's letter, not its spirit). The wing's thesis is attested across five records; its members are individually light — the court sees both facts.
D-12 · N15 — Over-the-street banner file.
Shop 10
Failure-mode claim Shop 10 (Rickererer +2 +3 storm-failure outcome; flyplainsdrifta +2 +3 own-banner outcome) / Doc 0 / 10. Doctrine limb Shop 3 (tulsagraphics +2; DL Signs +1 second-hand). Wind slits contested (relay +1 vs OP's spec by practice — inside D-12's claim composition).
D-13 · Solvent-saturation / dwell file (134560) — filed unmerged from N9.
Shop 10 · Shop Corroborated
Practice spectrum Shop 10 (5 shops ×2: ams, heyskull, player, BALLPARK, tmedvetz — practices attested, no failure-rate outcomes; SHOP CORROBORATED as a spectrum of practice, not as any single dwell time) / mechanism limbs contested: saturation-recovery (bob +2, Techman +2 = 4) vs laminated-failure (Bosh +2) vs no-wait-no-failures experience (Jr Douglas Imaging +2). Ghost-image harm case Shop 5 (spectrum maine +2 +3 lease-buyout outcome), mechanism three-way contested on the same record, the poster's distribution rebuttal (door bottoms as bad as hood/roof) preserved as the discriminating observation.
D-14 · Oracal browning (133689).
Shop 10 · Doc 0 · Total 10
Shop 10 (2 shops ×2 = 4 · two discriminating outcomes +3 +3: browning with an unprinted control in both shops) / Doc 0 / Total 10.
the maker's off-gassing defense
the maker's off-gassing defense — answered in both shops by the unprinted control; vendor weight 0 of its own.
D-20 · 8508 reformulation chapter (177957 WI-1).
Shop 5 · Doc 5 · Total 10 · Contested limbs inside
Shop 5 (OP +2 +3 two-year-burn outcome, extreme-UV bounded) / Doc 5 (vendor notice quoted verbatim — manufacturer spec-or-disclaimer class, relay grade, F2) / Total 10, shop lane building, so it sits below the both-high group despite the total. Construction-history limbs contested (ikarasu +2 / White Haus +2). Pairing split (WI-2) three ways at +2–4 per position.
D-16 · De-energize file (160982) — a SPLIT entry; the court gets the practice and its price list together.
Shop 8 · Shop Corroborated
Boundary claim (novices must not remove illuminated signs) Shop 8 (4 voices ×2: d fleming, Gino, signage, Johnny Best — SHOP CORROBORATED, no dissent on the boundary). LOTO procedure Shop 5 (MikePro +2 + his conversion-by-injury outcome +3). Contrary hot-work practice Shop 2 (Texas_Signmaker, first-person — attested *as practice*, bottom-barrel *as doctrine*). Consequence accounts Shop 7 (netsol +2 +3 witnessed hospitalization; Notarealsignguy +2 near-miss). No limb is averaged into another; per Danny's standing principle the split itself is the exhibit.
D-17 · CCI gate (inside N11).
Shop 7 · Doc 0 · Total 7 · Shop Corroborated · Shop Corroborated; Contested limbs inside
Shop 7 (3 shops ×2 = 6: 154346, 164622, 178517, three model lines, 2019–2024 · partial outcome +1, third shop resigned to pay, payment unreported) / Doc 0 / Total 7, SHOP CORROBORATED (threshold met on shops and points). Software-stranding limb Shop 6 (162117, three owners ×2). Contested modern-purchase limb: Shop 2 (henry67 — one shop, two threads, counted once, §7 X2), bottom barrel, one-sided. Before-side practice limb Shop 2 (henryz; Bradley D is vendor, +0, his warning recorded as context).
D-18 · Surfactant-cleaner adhesion inhibition (177355 WI-1).
Shop 6 · Doc 0 · Total 6 · Shop Corroborated · Shop Corroborated
Shop 6 (3 shops ×2: Smoke_Jaguar, TEN, DL Signs — mechanism named by two, no dissent, no outcome test in-thread) / Doc 0 / Total 6, SHOP CORROBORATED at the exact threshold — flagged F3. Prep-cleaner taxonomy limb Shop 2 (DL Signs single voice) beside the 2-shop denatured practice (+4).
D-19 · Repo doctrine (3 threads: 95143, 94355, 110192).
Shop 6 · Doc 0 · Total 6 · Shop Corroborated · Shop Corroborated
Shop 6 (Pass 3 basis + Pass 28's third thread) / Doc 0 / Total 6, SHOP CORROBORATED as practice — its entire legal layer sits in the verification queue (G8) and is scored nowhere.
D-23 · Optimizer contradiction — docketed as an open discrimination question.
Shop 4
Raise-optimizer limb Shop 4 (studebaker +2, dypinc +2; package advice, no isolated outcome). No-help limb Shop 3 (162096 OP +2 +1 partial — the "outcome" changed ink load and cure with it, so it is an un-isolated negative observation, discounted here to partial and the discount shown). Neither limb isolates the variable; no REFUTED marker applies — nothing has been tested. The discriminating test is G3.
D-24 · N16 — Aerial-lift file.
Shop 4
Overload-practice limb Shop 4 (Gino's attested practice +2; JBurton's tip-over mechanics +2 — presented as practice-vs-mechanics, never averaged). Disabled-interlock purchase lesson Shop 2 (JBurton single voice — bottom barrel as pattern, safety-flagged for the court). The BC licensing question was never answered in-thread (G7).
D-21 · Error-liability file (N18, 167976 item 3).
Shop 2
Five positions at Shop 2 each (caribmike; JWitkowski; Boudica; Notarealsignguy; letterman7), the names limb reinforced by Stacey K (+2 +3 her reprint-and-verify outcome). No position is corroborated; the file is the exhibit — flagged F4. Companion limbs of the same thread: dwell-time billing Shop 5 (two computations, filed as a range); gild cure-window policy Shop 7 (letterman7 +2, Gino +2, OP's applied outcome +3) — that limb alone is corroboration-grade and is docketed here so the court can sever it; cost-disclosure dispute, three positions at +2.
D-22 · B29 — File-rights positions (five).
Shop 2
Positions at Shop 2 each (176642, 166784, 56717, 152287); 131402's limb Shop 5 (+2 +3 enforcement-landed-on-client incidents). A position file, not a doctrine — F4 applies.
D-25 · Vendor-continuity remainder (N11).
Shop 2
Cyrious→Corebridge limb, ShopVox limbs (144867 + 160860), SAi limbs (179967, 172540), EstiMate arc (complete, 3 dates) — each at Shop 2–5 on Pass 3 / DONE-entry basis, none re-scored upward this pass. Daige orphaning limb Shop 1 (single observation, inference stated by its poster — inference grade). Lease-trap pair Shop 4 (90520 + Geneva Capital thread, 2 shops). N3 limbs 160276 / 151645 at Shop 2 each.
D-26 · Carried Pass 3 clusters at their labels
Scored by members
(Tranche B; untouched by the increment; Pass 3 firsthand basis): N1, N2, N4 (as refined by D-21/X4), N5, N6, N7 stand as Pass 3 left them, re-banded under Amendment 3 by their Pass 3 compositions — none crosses a band boundary on re-banding except as already noted above. The 3M failure complex (117904 + 147581) stands as one complex, two mechanisms, never pooled, each mechanism at Pass 3 weight. 154425's powder-coat contest stays unmerged.
---
Bottom barrel (0–2 points)
Single claims, banked at the lowest rating — never deleted, waiting on evidence.
Plasticizer claims
(4 pointers: 181419, 179365, 181194, 170134): the underlying coalescence-cause claims sit at single-shop weight; the *test prescriptions* are not attestations of results. P Wagner's pointer is a vendor voice (+0). Zero reported results — G1.
OMAS pointers
(179829, 179469): prescribed, never cashed; 180003's OMAS-off run is a negative on a different fault shape, scored as its own event, not as an OMAS answer. G2.
henry67 ACE+ limb
(137100 + 148253): Shop 2, contested, one-sided — one shop counted once (X2).
NCAA wrestling-mat prohibition
(181690 WI-3): Shop 2, single-voice recollection — verification queue (G8).
Daige orphaning inference
(69159 WI-4): Shop 1, inference grade.
Rolls-plasticize pointer
(182769 WI-2): Shop 2 (Boudica), in-thread support, no same-product replacement test.
Dew-point rival mechanism
(175952, netsol): vendor voice, +0, unconfirmed — preserved as a rival, carries nothing.
Layout-longevity doctrine
(176087 WI-4, bob): Shop 2, single-voice doctrine, unopposed and untested.
N3 single limbs
(160276, 151645): Shop 2 each.
Dimitar software pointer
(148253): a plea, not an item — pointer felt beside 162117, scored nowhere.
Single-voice method items banked at weight
: paper-strip nip test's companions in the craft line; DL Signs' cleaner taxonomy (Shop 2, inside D-18's entry).
Refuted-and-capped
(kept, per the refutation rule, below their refuting evidence): Solventinkjet's two harmlessness claims (under D-1); the maker's off-gassing defense (under D-14); the 159336 Corel-conspiracy frame — REFUTED on its own record (the frame dissolved to Windows-10 drift; the file stays refused, not reopened).
Reference only. Compiled from the cited code as of the date shown; ordinances change. Confirm with the authority having jurisdiction before designing or permitting a sign.